One of my posts this season set off a flurry (okay a few comments) about the use of AI.
As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with it. I mostly hate AI imagery and I don't like AI being used as a competent substitute for skilled workers because in its current state, it's not. It does have its place and I've used it for humorous purposes as well as a lead when researching things. But I don't stop at the AI overview like many people do.
Where I work, our managers actually encourage us to use AI and when I'm shown some "answer" to a complex question by a person who simply Googled it and relied on AI, I push back and explain how AI works, how anything on the internet can influence the answers and that you have to check sources.
One of my blog posts has proven my point. A friend of mine, after reading that blog post about my memories of Bigfoot mania in 1977, Googled, looking for why there may have been an increase in attention in Bigfoot in the St. Louis area in 1977. He found this: